I just heard Hillary
Clinton on Geo TV that was live telecasting her press conference from Pakistan.
In the backdrop of US and Pak Flags Glamorous Khar the foreign minister of
Pakistan was trying to answer some tough questions. She was clearly appearing a
novice. To me it appeared as if she was a mouth piece of someone and definitely
not the one who commanded real power and ability to give meaning to the good
English that she was vomiting. The stage is almost set for action in “days and
weeks and not in months and years” said articulate and clear Clinton. It sends
chill in your spine especially when you sit in Kabul where not only the strategy
for actions will be decided but is possibly also a place of action.
Days and weeks remind me
of the paucity of time in the field of Public Policy. It is almost always the
case. The decision is always quick but the tradeoffs in the process impact you
for years and generations. I now wait for history to unfold in this case
because decisions will have to be made and will be made.
One such decision was made
at the beginning of this year to be precise in February 2011. Let us connect
the dots backwards.
A young officer aged 27
became the head of a nation in a blood less coup way back in 1969 aiming to sweep away capitalism and socialism in his country.
At the age of 69 he met a violent and vengeful death after 42 years of rule in
a continent where many populations have less than 4 decades as the life
expectancy. It is ironical that he lay flat in a pool of blood exposing half-naked torso, with eyes staring vacantly at those
whom he considered “rats” and who jubilantly were yanking
his head up and down by his hair. The statement ‘I live in the hearts of
millions’ that he said as recently as February, was rudely mocking him. This was
all the more ironical as he wrote in the Green Book -
a required reading in all Libyan schools “In the era of the masses, power is in
the hands of the people themselves and leaders disappear forever”.
Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi the
longest-serving Arab or African leader was the face of Libya. Born in Sirte a town
on the craggy edge of Mediterranean not far from Tripoli, to an illiterate
Bedouin parents , he was the king of a sizeable number. Seen factually, Libyans
owe a lot to him. He was the one who gave Libya its name. We no longer confuse
between Liberia, lebnanon and Libya.
Though oil was discovered
in 1959 Libya was then desperately poor. It was only post 1969 it forced oil
companies to cede majority stakes in exchange for continued access to the
country’s oil fields, demanding a greater share of the profits. This changed
the rules of the game with the oil giants and was widely emulated across all
oil producing states. With the increased revenue, came roads, hospitals,
schools and housing. Life expectancy, which averaged 51 years in 1969, is now
over 74. Literacy is 88 percent. Per capita annual income is above $12,000.
This is in spite of United Nations economic sanctions in the most of 80ies and 90ies
that were finally lifted in 2003.
But where did “the
king of Kings” err? Was it the disconnect from the changing reality or the failure
to read the writings on the wall? Or was it the lack of institutions of check and
balance?
Whatever it be, the one failure for certain was the lack of his ability on
deciding an effective “Exit Strategy”.
“Exit strategy”
reminds me of an anecdote at Lee Kuan Yew School of public policy. I was
slightly late to one of the post lunch seminars. As would be normal I occupied
one of the chairs next to the entrance so as to not disturb my cohorts. After a
couple of minutes, our Dean Kishore walked in and grabbed a seat next to me.
Naughty me, I poked “Seems you wish to leave quietly and smartly”. And the
response left me with an important lesson in Public policy. He said “Uttam, it
is important to have an exit strategy. Look at the condition of America in
Iraq. It was easy to get into but aren’t they struggling to get out?” How true
is that learning? I am experiencing it day in and day out here in Afghanistan.
And interestingly it is again America.
My dear, “the
brother leader,” “the guide to the era of the masses,” “the king of kings of
Africa” or “the leader of the revolution”; whatever way you wish to call yourself, Exit Strategy is very important and
timely smart exit makes all the difference says Public Policy.
Last but not
the least the very institutions that you think are a threat may save you if
shaped and nurtured. Because anything that would last are Values and
Institutions and not whims and fancies. It is not out of place to note that Libya
had no parliament, no unified military command, no political parties, no
unions, no civil society and no nongovernmental organizations. And of course Mr
Gaddaffi had no intelligent “Exit Strategy” that could have saved his rule and
family from falling like a pack of cards.
No comments:
Post a Comment